|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 17 post(s) |
Dave Stark
3628
|
Posted - 2013.09.10 21:16:00 -
[1] - Quote
came expecting clarification; left even more confused.
so, what is and isn't allowed now in comparison to before? the GMs say all is the same but the ToS change clearly contradicts that.
could we get a GM and a ToS that agree with each other? |
Dave Stark
3628
|
Posted - 2013.09.10 21:45:00 -
[2] - Quote
didn't that whole alt thing originate from some guy awoxing freighters with a vindicator after he applied to the freighter pilot's corp claiming to be the freighter pilot's alt? which was, until that spree, completely legit? |
Dave Stark
3631
|
Posted - 2013.09.10 21:55:00 -
[3] - Quote
Ganque wrote:Dave Stark wrote:didn't that whole alt thing originate from some guy awoxing freighters with a vindicator after he applied to the freighter pilot's corp claiming to be the freighter pilot's alt? which was, until that spree, completely legit? So some idiot was dumb enough to let someone into his corp that claimed to be an alt of one of his members without taking the very minimal precaution of checking this postulated fact, then took the time and trouble to petition his own stupidity and somehow got a positive result from the GMs, thus reinforcing his know nothing not my responsibilty attitude, and somehow setting a precedent on the matter
that's unfortunate; because i thought it was a great story. stories like that were why i started playing eve, I'm sure i'm not the only one. |
Dave Stark
3632
|
Posted - 2013.09.10 22:13:00 -
[4] - Quote
Evelgrivion wrote:"You may not create a character for the purpose of stealing the name and likeness of another player, or non-player entity. Inaccurate claims of identity are otherwise permitted."
Wouldn't that work a little better, and provide a clearer guideline for what is and isn't allowed?
so if i make a character called chribbba and use him as a trade alt for a week, then impersonate him thereafter it's fine because that wasn't the purpose of the character as it's purpose was to flip items in jita? |
Dave Stark
3637
|
Posted - 2013.09.11 17:38:00 -
[5] - Quote
Random Majere wrote:And I though high sec miners were cry babies!!
Cultural change hurts !!
yes, because it's never worth questioning conflicting information which if interpreted incorrectly could result in being banned.
this isn't a case of htfu, this is a case of some one needs to actually clarify something instead of posting an ambiguous copy paste response that conflicts with what has been published elsewhere. |
Dave Stark
3637
|
Posted - 2013.09.11 17:43:00 -
[6] - Quote
This is how I imagine the GMs are right now. |
Dave Stark
3637
|
Posted - 2013.09.11 17:49:00 -
[7] - Quote
Random Majere wrote:Dave Stark wrote:Random Majere wrote:And I though high sec miners were cry babies!!
Cultural change hurts !! yes, because it's never worth questioning conflicting information which if interpreted incorrectly could result in being banned. this isn't a case of htfu, this is a case of some one needs to actually clarify something instead of posting an ambiguous copy paste response that conflicts with what has been published elsewhere. Who cares!!!! Just go sit outside and take a beer! You should feel better after that.
who cares? people who'd rather not get banned for doing what they've always done.
i'm glad having a beer fixes everything in your little fantasy land, buddy. |
Dave Stark
3645
|
Posted - 2013.09.11 19:54:00 -
[8] - Quote
i'll be honest i haven't massively been following this thread; does the ToS agree with the GMs posts yet? |
Dave Stark
3645
|
Posted - 2013.09.11 19:58:00 -
[9] - Quote
Murk Paradox wrote:Dave Stark wrote:i'll be honest i haven't massively been following this thread; does the ToS agree with the GMs posts yet? They are still having "internal discussions" about it.
i don't know what i was expecting, really. |
Dave Stark
3645
|
Posted - 2013.09.11 19:59:00 -
[10] - Quote
greiton starfire wrote:Dave Stark wrote:i'll be honest i haven't massively been following this thread; does the ToS agree with the GMs posts yet? nope now we have, "case by case basis" instead. so gm's can say screw what the tos says and do what they want.
so if i give the GMs 20% of all my scam revenue it's not against the ToS? |
|
|
|
|